The Lone Ranger
Here ’s everything that run short amiss with Disney’sThe Lone Rangermovie . Created for radio in the 1930s , the onetime Texas Ranger - turned masked vigilante known as The Lone Ranger would quickly go on to become a tonic ethnic icon in the first one-half of the 20th century and make the jump to TV in 1949 , with Clayton Moore and John Hart playing the titulary role opposite Jay Silverheels as his Native American comrade Tonto . From there , the characters went on to star in a smattering of theatrical films , including a pair of movies release as part of the TV serial in the ' 50s .
By the time Disney begin work on aLone Rangermovie reboot in the late 2000s , it had already been tightlipped to thirty geezerhood since the character ’s most late appearance on the big screen ( in 1981’sThe Legend of the Lone Ranger , itself afailed reboot ) , which begged the question of whether the dimension was actually commercially executable any longer . In malice of those fear ( and hoping to replicate their recent success with the originalPirates of the Caribbeantrilogy ) , the Mouse House recruitedPirates 1 - 3writers Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio to write the film before later charter Jack Sparrow himself , Johnny Depp , to play Tonto opposite then up - and - comer Armie Hammer as the hint .
interrelate : TRON : Legacy - What Went Wrong With Disney ’s Long - Awaited subsequence
AfterPiratestrilogy steerer Gore Verbinski came aboard as its film director in 2010 , it seemed that withThe Lone RangerDisney had most of the pieces in berth to become a collision . Of naturally , things did n’t work out as plan andThe Lone Ranger ’s box officewas a dud three year later , losing as much as $ 160 - 190 million . In true statement , however , there were already concerns about the expensive western sandwich well before it open , and for reason that go beyond questions about the populace ’s pastime ( or lack thereof ) in the reboot to set out with .
Disney’s Lone Ranger Was Far Too Expensive
With an reckon budget of $ 225 - 250 million plus $ 150 million in marketing cost , The Lone Ranger ’s box seat billet returns would ’ve inescapably struggled to cover its costs , regardless of its general response . The Mouse House was well - cognisant of that too , which is why they formally delay production on the movie in the summer of 2011 in an exploit to reduce their expenditures . This all took place just a few months after the studio ’s motion - seizure movieMars Needs Momshad bombed at the box office ( lose upwards of $ 144 million ) andthe budget for their then - unreleasedJohn Carterhad inflate as eminent as $ 263 million , so there was added pressure on Disney to to getThe Lone Ranger ’s budget under control before shooting began . Their spending issues were also public knowledge by then , which resulted in a lot of electronegative other press for the film , even after the cast and crew took a salary cut to serve with the larger costs .
Its budget was n’t the only reasonThe Lone Rangerstruggled to generate positive bombination ahead of its loss , either . There was already the controversy over Depp ’s casting as Tonto , despite the actor ’s claims of having Native American ancestry and intent to use the moving-picture show as a way to"chip away a lilliputian chip at the [ Tonto ] cliche,“as he tell theNational Postin 2013 . Others took issue withPirates of the Caribbeandirector Verbinski ’s deconstructionist glide slope to retell The Lone Ranger ’s origin narration , which he described as”‘Don Quixote ' told from [ his sidekick ] Sancho Panza ’s stage of view"in a 2011 consultation withHero Complex . Whether they prefer The Lone Ranger and Tonto in their original phase or felt the property needed to be re - imagined in a more bona fide manner ( in terms of its representation of Indigenous Americans ) to sense less antiquated , there were few masses who seemed genuinely excited about the film before of its loss .
Related : Did Jungle Cruise ’s Failure Hurt Pirates of the Caribbean 6 ?
Disney’s Lone Ranger Was Slated By Critics (& Had Lots Of Issues)
When it finally opened in house , The Lone Ranger ’s boxful agency may have been hurt by the beating it took from critics ( see : its 31 % rating on Rotten Tomatoes ) , and for valid reason . The movie has many of the sameflaws as Verbinski’sPirates of the Caribbeansequels , include a bloated runtime ( just suddenly of 2.5 minute ) and a mussy narrative that too often meanders ( especially during the second act ) . It ’s also apparent the script was subjected to multiple rewrites intended to water - down its post - modernistic re - examination ofThe Lone Rangermythology and make it more of a established bunch - pleaser ; to cite Alonso Duralde in his review forThe Wrap,“the motion picture feels always deplume between deconstructing the legend and presenting it in a straight manner . “As for Depp : his portrayal of Tonto as a capable warrior whose idiosyncratic behavior stanch from the injury of his past times works well enough early on , yet it more and more comes across as a hackneyed - and , at worst , culturally and racially insensitive - shtick as the celluloid run on .
Lone Ranger Was Hamstrung By Its Competition
Combined with all the bad buzz from its budgeting troubles , the negative reviews only further damagedThe Lone Ranger ’s box office prospects . Even then , the movie fell poor of projections , taking in $ 48.9 million domestically over the five - day Fourth of July holiday frame in 2013 ( or around $ 11 - 20 million less than box federal agency tracker were predicting ) . In fairness , this can also be assign to the film ’s stiff than anticipated competition : The Lone Rangerpremiered the same weekend asthe animated sequelDespicable Me 2 , which transcend expectations by make for in $ 143.1 million in its first five days play in the U.S. ( setting a raw record book for animated movie openings ) . That signify any families that might ’ve determine to take a chance onThe Lone Ranger- even with the unfit reviews - under unlike circumstances were off watching Gru and the Minions ' devilment instead .
Lone Ranger Is Still A Better Disney Movie Than Its Box Office Suggests
As sprawling and tonally confused asThe Lone Rangercan be , it also has an undeniably personal touching ( there ’s no mistaking Verbinski ’s unique blend of violence and goofiness ) and is far more willing to take endangerment than mostlive - action Disney remakes and rebootsin the years since its get along out . On top of that , it boast some genuinely entertaining situated piece of music ( most notably , the bounteous train chronological sequence during the third act ) and might ’ve made for an engaging summertime smash hit with some additional redaction and tightening of the tale . Disney’sThe Lone Rangermovie is a unknown brute full of thing one would never expect to find out in a Disney tentpole , like cannibalism , and aspires to draw off an extremely precarious balancing deed , exemplify by one of its more bewildering moments – follow a scene in which numerous Native American people are kill in battle with a visual muzzle involving a cavalry in a tree . Whether audience experience that it work a little , a passel , or not at all , it ’s a movie that entrust an impression and , as whole , reflects a prison term when the Mouse House was willing to risk bankruptcy with mega - expensive smash hit likeTomorrowland ’s flop . Much likeThe Lone Ranger , it ’s far weirder yet also more captivating than its legacy might suggest .
Would The Original Werewolf Plan Have Saved Lone Ranger?
One interesting note that has since been revealed in consultation with conductor Gore Verbinski is that the original script was stand for to include more supernatural elements , including a lycanthrope . In an interview withCollider , Verbinski say that the wolfman were added during a version of the book before he came alongside , but he removed them in favor of a plot of land about the developing West pass on the Lone Ranger and Tonto by . integrate loup-garou would have proceed against the dealership ’s past , which was set in an exaggerated version of the Old West but avoid explicitly supernatural elements . However , a more over - the - top version ofThe Lone Rangerthat comprise fantastical elements like toPirates of the Caribbean ’s Davy Jones ' devilfish facecould have suit Depp ’s theatrical mode well than the more emotionally layer story that Verbinski attempted .
at long last , incorporate werewolves or any other plot chemical element in all likelihood would n’t have savedThe Lone Ranger ’s box authority . Depp ’s star king was waning , and modern audiences were n’t interested in the character . A more risible - book - esqueLone Rangerwith werewolves or other supernatural foes might have been more entertaining to watch , but not enough for the picture to make back its immense budget . In the end , this might have been a well thing for Disney , as an extendedLone Rangerfilm series could have been a PR nightmare devote the accusations of abuse that have since been leveled at both Depp and Hammer , and the growing concern with precise depictions of autochthonic culture . But the werewolf caption remains another element of the narration that makes Verbinski’sThe Lone Rangersuch a fascinating Hollywood tragedy .
