Vikings
The character of Ivar the Boneless ( kind of ) had a son inVikingsseason 5 , but the baby Baldur was leave in the forest to pass away due to a facial deformity — so , what was wrong with Ivar ’s son ? It ’s the fortune that Ivar narrowly avoided as a babe when Ragnar Lothbrok see that Ivar had a deformity in his leg and took him to the Wood to be left to his fate . The season 5 last of Baldur brings Ivar ’s tale full in this way . So , what was unseasonable with baby Baldur , and why did Ivar kill him ?
Ivar ’s wife Freydis on the QT think a child with another man and then convinced Ivar that he had successfully impregnated her when she salute some of his blood , despite his impotency . Believing himself to be a god , Ivarnamed the baby after Odin ’s son Baldur . While Freydis saw the beauty in Baldur , Ivar picture only a son who was deformed . Despite Baldur ’s face being never shown , what was incorrect with Ivar ’s boy was credibly a scissure lip . This congenital disability results in the lip and sometimes the roof of the mouth improperly forming , result in a stock split that can be so large that it open up up into the nostril .
Ivar Killed Baldur To Protect Him From Deformity (But Also Due To Pride)
While babies bear in forward-looking time with a cleft mouth or roof of the mouth are able to be treated with livelihood and eventually have corrective surgery , in the time in which Vikings is set , what was incorrect with Ivar ’s son would have been close to Ivar ’s brittle off-white disease in spell out sure death . While some baby who are born with a cleft lip or roof of the mouth can nurse with aid , Ivar and the midwife ’s reaction to run across the baby suggests the emergence was quite severe . The closecomparisons betweenVikingscharactersIvar and Baldur might suggest that Baldur could have pull round had his don been willing to give the male child a chance .
While it ’s unknown what was faulty with sister Baldur , Ivar may have at least been able to supply him with a prospect for his wife ’s interest . Ivar ’s decision for leaving Baldur to go is pretty complicated . As he says goodbye to his Word , he tell him that he ’s doing it so that Baldur wo n’t feel the same suffering that Ivar himself went through growing up . However , it ’s clear that Ivar is also concerned in protecting his own pride and image . He has represent himself to his people as a living god , and he fears that what was wrong with Ivar ’s son will remind people of his own disease .
When he account Baldur ’s death to his citizenry , he tells them that the baby was beautiful and utter in every agency , completely omitting what was wrong with Ivar ’s son . Sadly , it ’s before long revealed that fox dragged babe Baldur into their hideaway and put down any grounds to the reverse . So , in that obedience , it did n’t count what was incorrect with baby Baldur . The decease of Baldur is ultimately the result of Ivar the Boneless ' failure to heed his father ’s advice .
During their two - military man " raid " of Wessex , Ragnar told Ivar the Boneless that his deformity had made him the strongest out of all his brothers and that it was a blessing rather than a curse . But when Baldur is born , Ivar permit his insecurities to get the best of him . Had he let Baldur live , the ensuing battle against his comrade would have ended with their crippling frustration . Butin killing Freydis’baby and turning her against him , Ivar pave the fashion for his own downfall .
Did Ivar Kill Baldur Because He Knew The Baby Wasn’t His?
InVikings , it may not have been what was wrong with child Baldur that lead to his tragical end . Instead , it ’s entirely within the realm of possibility that Ivar the Boneless knew the babe was n’t his — which would ’ve wounded his already unsafe pride . There is a moment in the serial in which Ivar could ’ve questioned Freydis ' commitment but then accepted that his perceived Norse god blood made her fraught rather of sacrificing his own pride . If Ivar knew that another homo impregnate Freydis , it might have bring on a sorting of breakdown , as his self-importance had develop so large at this item that he authentically believed he was a god .
That sort of newsworthiness coupled with what was wrong with Ivar ’s son would not only crush his disembodied spirit , but also his very self . Such an insult to his ego - image would n’t have been aim lightlyin Viking culture . On the other deal , Ivar ’s impotence was questioned because he could get Katia pregnant , but only after consider she was Freydis incarnated . While his powerlessness in earlier seasons surely affected his relationship with Freydis , it did n’t seem to be a problem in the end .
On top of that , if Ivar definitively knew that Baldur was n’t his , it could explicate Baldur ’s death but not the fact that he let Freydis and the other piece live . If Ivar really knew about Freydis ' affair onVikings , it would ’ve surely cease in several character ' deaths due to the coke to his ego . What was wrong with Ivar ’s son is never entirely explain on the show , but there are enough cue in the episode to suggest what infant Baldur ’s deformity was . However , the demise of child Baldur goes down a little other than in Viking history .
Did The Real Ivar The Boneless Kill His Infant Son?
Vikingsis well be intimate to toy with recorded history . It ’s not laborious to do , look at Viking saga are the show ’s main informant of plot , and their history is full of both self-contradictory accounts and figures that may or may not have existed at all . Showrunners have admitted that they ’ve greatly embellished the tales of Ragnar Lothbrok and his small fry , but how about what was amiss with Ivar ’s son and his subsequent death ? Ivar ’s Word is reportedly fable , as the real Ivar the Boneless was never known to father any children . It ’s probable thatVikingswas right on the impotence ingredient of his persona .
In addition , Ivar the Boneless was never known to have taken a spouse . In price of history , Ivar whole disappears from historical records in about 870 and there was nary a detail about his personal life , to begin with . Many Viking saga describe Ivar as either not have leg or being " boneless , " with one particular passage inThe Tale of Ragnar ’s Sonssuggesting that he was impotent . Therefore , the tragical tale of what was incorrect with Ivar ’s son was entirely made up specifically forVikingsand to add a certain flavor to Ivar ’s eccentric electric arc .
