Little Shop of Horrors
Summary
The 1986 version ofLittle Shop of Horrorsconcludes with Audrey II ’s frustration , but the film ’s alternate ending saw the exotic plant take over the existence . It ’s often say that Hollywood does n’t have any original idea any longer , which is , of class , an overstatement . Plenty of original film still get release , however they often do n’t get the same theatrical and merchandising thrust that the latest superhero smash hit or franchise sequels get . Still , for those suspicious of the film industry due to its lack of originality , one need only look at the screaming and musicalLittle Shop of Horrors .
ThoughLittle Shop of Horrorshas had many iterations over the years , the basic premise has remained the same . Thedark musical moviefollows a shy man named Seymour and a bodacious but troubled woman mention Audrey who work in grasping Mr. Mushnik ’s flower shop . Looking to boost occupation , Seymour buys a particularly unequalled plant , a Venus flytrap of sorts , that he begins to cultivate . However , things take a turn when the flytrap , named Audrey II , begins demand blood in decree to arise . Seymour , often a bystander in sprightliness , offer his own parentage at first , but when that is n’t enough , the booster must make some difficult - and uproarious - decision .
Related:10 Behind - The - Scenes About The qualification Of Little Shop Of Horrors
Movie Vs. Musical: How Little Shop Of Horrors Began
While most audience are likely intimate withLittle Shop of Horrors , their connection to it may vary due to the tale ’s many variation . However , written out plainly , Little Shop of Horrorsorigin points are as so : First and first , there was the 1960 motion picture , TheLittle Shop of Horrors . The film was directed by Roger Corman and written by Charles B. Griffith . Though it is unclear what root on Griffith to compose such a singular tale , some hypothesise that he could have force from stories like John Collier ’s " Green Thoughts " or Arthur C. Clarke ’s " The Reluctant Orchid . " Despite the account ’s gruesome themes , it was design to be a farce .
1960’sTheLittle Shop of Horrorssaw great success among hearing , which lead to the film ’s melodic version . In 1982 , famed composer Alan Menken team up with playwright Howard Ashman to developThe Little Shop of Horrorsinto a rock melodious . While the show mostly maintained Charles Griffith ’s original story , it was arguably improved by catchy music and theatrical flair . Ultimately , 1982’sLittle Shop of Horrorsbecame a staple fiber in melodious theater , and is well known for its use of massive fleeceable creature to portray Audrey II . In fact , Little Shop of Horrorsis still performed systematically to this day , and in 2023 , is playing off - broadway in New York City .
Finally , there is 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrors . This is arguably the most well - have sex iteration of the chronicle . aim by Frank Oz , this interlingual rendition ofLittle Shop of Horrorsis actually an adaptation of the 1982 musical rather than a reboot of the 1960 pic , as indicated by the film ’s use of the music from the theatrical show . Ultimately , 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrorsis in all likelihood the most pop translation because of its accessibility as a film , immix with its use of the musical ’s fun soundtrack . Plus , the film ’s cast , include Rick Morianis , Ellen Greene , Steven Martin , Jim Belushi , and Bill Murray , is full of iconic and screaming actors .
1986’s Little Shop Of Horrors Has An Alternate Ending
Because 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrorsis the most popular , many might be surprised to find out that the picture show ’s closing was suppose to be dissimilar . Little Shop of Horrorsactually has an alternate ending that never made it to the full-grown - blind . For audience , the movie terminate when Audrey II prove to be out of control , necessitate more and more blood . Seymour , dire to control his monster , pull up stakes Mushnik ’s to find another meal for the plant . Meanwhile , Audrey II tempt Audrey to the shop to rust her . luckily , Seymour return before Audrey can be eaten , and he ultimately electrocutes Audrey II to pull through humanness . Seymour and Audrey live happily ever after .
Although this ending is what most audiences are familiar with , this glad decision was n’t always the architectural plan . Director Frank Oz originally wantedLittle Shop of Horrorsto have a much dissimilar ending- one that was in reality much dark . This sorry termination would n’t have been entirely out of character for theLittle Shop of Horrorsfranchise either . In world , Oz ’s glad finish in 1986 was an outlier compared to the original disconsolate endings of the narrative ’s other iteration . So , what was the end ofLittle Shop of Horrorssupposed to be , what did the other conclusion look like , and why did Frank Oz vary it ?
How 1986’s Little Shop Of Horrors Was Supposed To End
Frank Oz ’s 1986Little Shop of Horrorswas supposed to end with Audrey II taking over the world . The finis starts off likewise , with Audrey II demand another human sacrifice and Seymour run off to detect one . Audrey is round by Audrey II , however this time , Seymour ca n’t save Audrey . On her deathbed , she asks him to feed her to the works so that he can exert his success . Seymour does as she wishes , but seek to kill Audrey II anyway . finally , Audrey II eat Seymour too . Without a steward , Audrey II plants are sell around the world , leading the species to down off all humankind .
As it turns out , this grim conclusion is not a unusual turn forLittle Shop of horror . In actuality , it fits perfectly into the other endings within the enfranchisement . Although the 1960 movie , the 1982 melodic , and the 1986 picture show musical all have different endings , a dark-skinned thread unquestionably tie them all together , or at least , links to Frank Oz ’s original , cut ending . Overall , Little Shop of Horrorshas always ended in a dark-skinned manner until 1986 .
How 1960’s The Little Shop Of Horrors EndedThe Little Shop of Horrorsending is especially troubling. Seymour and Audrey Jr. have found great success among the public, however, the police are suspicious of Seymour. During a celebration at Mushnik’s wherein Seymour receives honors for his work and Audrey Jr.’s buds open, things go awry when the buds reveal the faces of those Audrey Jr. ate. The police chase Seymour, intent on arresting him for murder, however he outruns them, and attempts to kill Audrey Jr. The end of the film sees Audrey Jr. dying, however one final bud opens, revealing Seymour’s face. Though he managed to kill the plant, he became another victim in the process.
How 1982’s Little Shop Of Horrors Musical Ended
The ending of 1982’sLittle Shop of Horrorsmusical is equally dark and coif the stage for 1986 ’s alternate end . The musical lay down Seymour running out to grab Audrey II another meal , and in that time , Audrey being lured into the plant life ’s trap . moreover , it showed Seymour being too late to save Audrey , and agreeing to feed her to Audrey II . Really , the only difference between the melodious and the 1986 alternate termination is that Seymour does n’t decide to kill Audrey II until the next Clarence Shepard Day Jr. , when he realizes that sales rep need to deal Audrey II to the world . He attempts to kill the plant and is eaten instead .
Other Differences Between Little Shop Of Horrors Movies & Musical
The conclusion are not the only differences betweenLittle Shop of Horrors’three iteration . In fact , there are several major differences between the 1960 film and the 1982 melodious , which then hemorrhage into the 1986 moving picture melodic adaptation . First and foremost , in 1960’sThe Little Shop of Horrors , the sadistic dental practitioner character is a man who fare to Mushnik ’s shop while , in the melodic , the tooth doctor is Audrey ’s scurrilous fellow . Also in the musical , the dentist is Audrey II ’s first forfeit , however in the 1960 film , Seymour first feeds the plant the corpse of a rummy before kill the dentist .
Another major variety between the 1960 film and the 1982 musical is the comprehension of the street urchins Crystal , Ronette , and Chiffon . The musical theater added this trio as narrator of sorts , like a Hellenic chorus line , that set the scene of Skidrow , and also , gossip on the story ’s plot . They also convey a sure measure of melodious merriment to the story . Aside from key changes such as these , there are several modest detail differences . For lesson , the plant ’s name changed from Audrey Jr. to Audrey II , and in the original 1960 film , Audrey Jr. had mesmeric might that were axed in the musical and 1986 movie .
Why 1986’s Little Shop Of Horrors Cut The Alternate Ending
Ultimately , 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrorshad to cut its alternate conclusion because test audiences disliked it . Though it would have made gumption for the film to keep the ending laid out in the 1982 musical , when it was presented to test interview , they dislike it . In some means , this draw sense . audience settle for Seymour and Audrey , so it ’s incredibly upsetting when they both die , and Audrey II takes over the existence . There is a factor of disappointment and unjustness that accompanies that ending . However , then again , this termination make sense for a level that is so outrageous , and in a sense , it is a more realistic ending .
So , althoughLittle Shop of Horrorsis supposed to be a cataclysm , the 1986 movie ends much more mirthfully . The main reasonableness for this was to keep audiences slaked , even though director Frank Oz wanted to maintain the original termination . However , it is n’t a entire deprivation . BecauseLittle Shop of Horrorscontinues to be performed for immense audiences yearly , and the 1960 movie is still available to watch , the story ’s original tragic finale is not totally wasted . For those who are truly attached to the story , they will make out the full extent ofLittle Shop of Horrors’history and various endings .
Little Shop Of Horrors Tragic Ending Is Better
Although test audiences dislike 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrorsalternate ending , it in all likelihood would have been the better choice . Considering thatLittle Shop of Horrorsis something of a franchise , it is strange that they all have different ending , and especially since one is completely happy when the other two are disturbing . If the 1986 version had stuck to the alternate conclusion , it would have been more consistent with the residue of the iteration . what is more , the tragic ending evokes a better excited reaction . Little Shop of Horrorsis a fun and screaming experience , which makes the dark cease even more efficacious . It stay with audiences for a long fourth dimension after .
By offering a happy end , 1986’sLittle Shop of Horrorsveered away from the distributor point and tone of the original chronicle . Though it is a comedy , it is also a farce comedy , meaning it is think to be totally out of this world and outrageous . Therefore , it makes horse sense that the story would go so far as to obliterate its primary fibre and let the villain have world domination . When Seymour and Audrey survive however , it is taking off the story ’s horse sense of ridiculousness . Even though the 1986 film hints that Audrey II may not be dead , that is n’t enough to maintain the original story ’s allegiance to the incredible .
What A Little Shop Of Horrors Reboot Ending Should Look Like
Since reboots are so popular these days , it would n’t be surprising if aLittle Shop of Horrorsremake was on the sensible horizon , and considering the 1986 closing , the remake ’s finale would be an authoritative question . In fact , in 2020 there were report of aremake starring Taron Egerton as Seymour , Scarlett Johansson as Audrey , and Chris Evans as Orin , however , thatLittle Shop of Horrorsremake has been canceled . Despite this , it is still crucial to view what a remake should do about its terminate when the time come . Ideally , aLittle Shop of Horrorsremake would employ the 1982 musical ’s original ending , or create an equally dark ending .
No matter which mode theLittle Shop of Horrorsremake determine to go , the picture must end on an disconcerting note . This is vital because it will bring back the tragical roots of the original history , which the 1986 version ultimately ignored . Plus , with a new cast of current stars , aLittle Shop of Horrorsremake could become the most democratic , and accepted , version of the tale . All in all , it is important forLittle Shop of Horrorsto maintain its grim ending because it help oneself equilibrise out the drollery , love , and upbeat music of the story , and also , it ensures that the story remain a travesty of heroic proportion .
